Risk Ranking Process

The Risk Ranking Process is a screening step Yinka Huwunline applies to every proposed harvest block before it can move ahead. 
 

What it does

  • Screens every new proposal as a first filter.  
  • Scores risk to our values using our own information.  
  • Produces a record of risks the licensee must respond to in co-planning.  
  • Flags where deeper planning and Keyoh direction are needed. 


Risk ranking is not a decision; Keyoh and leadership still decide what happens on the land. 
 

What the screening process looks at

 

  • Forest condition: primary or secondary forest, species, mix, how much of the stand is alive, forest health pressures  
  • Regrowth & retention: Density of young trees already growing, what can be kept standing so harvested area is not bare.  
  • Biodiversity: Overlap with Biodiversity Management Areas built from 30+ ecological and cultural attributes  
  • Water & fish: Watershed condition, fisheries-sensitive areas, spawning grounds  
  • Cultural & traditional use: Known traditional use sites, trails, and reserves in the Land & Stewardship Plan  
  • Cumulative pressure: How much has already been taken from the surrounding area, so each new block is weighed against the whole, not judged alone.
     

Harvest priorities

  1. Higher priority for harvest 
  • Stands already hit by disturbance  
  • Stands past their prime  
  • Areas with enough young regrowth underneath for the forest to recover 
  1. Higher risk
  • Live, healthy forests  
  • Older & primary forest  
  • Anything overlapping water, fish, wildlife, or cultural values 

 

How the scoring works

Harvest priority score + Risk to our values = Final risk rank 

 

Risk rankings  

  • Low: Little conflict with values. Co-planning and Keyoh review can move relatively quickly.  
  • Moderate: Real conflict with values. More time, mitigation, and Keyoh direction needed before  consent is possible.  
  • High: Serious conflict with values. Intensive work required and some block should not proceed. 

 

Potential outcomes

Proceeds, with conditions

  • Low conflict with values
  • Licensee’s commitments are written into co-planning record

Redesigned first

  • Boundaries pulled back from water or old forest
  • Retention increased, roads rerouted
  • Block changes shape until the risk comes down

Restoration attached

  • Harvest tied to restoration work
  • Rehabilitating old roads, replanting, repairing habitat

Does not proceed

  • Some places are simply no-go
  • Rank will be recorded in writing and reasoning stands for next proposal